Translation in progress — showing English pivot content.

Satellite

Where the measurements are

Drawn server-side from the public event read model. Every mark is a measurement: nothing here is interpolated, smoothed or inferred.

-6.6°-6.5°-6.4°-6.3°-6.2°-6.1°39.8°39.9°315 MWmodelled track · SNPP · 12:44 UTC10 kmCañaveralPedroso de AcimHolgueraPortezueloMirabel

What each mark means

Footprint at this scaleVIIRS (NASA) 375 mMeteosat (EUMETSAT) ≈2 km · not drawn

  • VIIRS (NASA)375 m

    Measured positions. Drawn at true footprint scale, brightest layer.

  • Meteosat (EUMETSAT)≈2 km23 min ago

    Measures how much energy the fire radiates, which is what sizes the glow. Its individual pixel positions are not stored, so no Meteosat footprint is drawn — inferring one from the sharper layer would put a fire pixel on ground nobody measured.

  • True geographic scale, corrected for latitude. Frame is about 48 km across.
  • The glow means “an event, roughly here”. Its area follows the measured power and its radius is capped, because an uncapped one would assert a burnt extent nobody measured. The number carries the magnitude.
  • Grey is what a later pass has superseded. Colour means the most recent sharp measurement, and it never fades with the clock — only newer knowledge demotes it.
  • Coastline, lakes and borders come from a generalised map with about 1,7 km between vertices, so treat every line as the shape of the geography and not as a surveyed boundary. It is drawn under the data and never over it.
  • Place names sit at their own coordinates from an offline index of populated places. They say what is near the measurements — not that any named place is burning, and not how far the fire reaches.
  • The dashed line is a modelled satellite ground track through the pass that produced the coloured detections — real published orbital parameters, measured pass time, modelled geometry. The swath is 3060 km wide, so where the satellite actually looked from inside it is unknown.

Satellite

Current facts

No satellite detection does not mean an area is safe. Cloud, sensor timing and heat below a sensor’s threshold can hide activity.

First seen1 ago 2026, 11:50 UTC
Last observation1 ago 2026, 16:00 UTC
Observed stateMeasurable thermal activity
Like-for-like trendNot enough comparable observations
Latest measured power315,1 MW · Meteosat
OfficialNo official source is linked to this event yet.

MTG · VIIRS · Official

Verification ladder

  • SeenObserved

    A satellite observed a thermal anomaly here. Repetition belongs at this step: seeing the same thing many times separates noise from signal, but it does not separate heat from bright ground. Observed by: Meteosat (EUMETSAT).

  • ConfirmedObserved

    The anomaly carries measured energy or a 375 m position — the calibrated Meteosat fire product, or a VIIRS detection. Persistence alone never lights this step, because sunlit dry ground is persistent by nature.

  • Quantified by VIIRSNot yet observed

    VIIRS (NASA) passed overhead and measured radiated power at a 375 m footprint. Between passes it says nothing.

  • Linked to an official sourceNot yet observed

    An official update has been matched to this event. Official information outranks everything above it.

Official

Official source record

Official information is shown separately and takes precedence over satellite interpretation.

No official source is linked to this event yet.

When each sensor looked

Meteosat looks every ten minutes; VIIRS passes a few times a day. The contrast is the point — between sharp passes there is no new sharp knowledge, only the ten-minute layer.

Meteosat (EUMETSAT)VIIRS (NASA)no observations on this rail08-01 11:50 UTC08-01 16:00 UTC · 23 min ago

VIIRS · Meteosat

Observation history

Day and night observations stay labelled. REYKR does not compare unlike times of day.

  1. Meteosat13 detections · average 130,8 MW · peak 315,1 MWDay
  2. Meteosat11 detections · average 186,7 MW · peak 442,1 MWDay
  3. Meteosat13 detections · average 241,7 MW · peak 602,8 MWDay
  4. Meteosat12 detections · average 192,6 MW · peak 519,2 MWDay
  5. Meteosat13 detections · average 227,1 MW · peak 616,4 MWDay
  6. Meteosat13 detections · average 415,9 MW · peak 1217,6 MWDay
  7. Meteosat13 detections · average 545,9 MW · peak 2211,2 MWDay
  8. Meteosat10 detections · average 331,7 MW · peak 991 MWDay
  9. Meteosat11 detections · average 233,5 MW · peak 548,2 MWDay
  10. Meteosat8 detections · average 238,2 MW · peak 572,2 MWDay
  11. Meteosat11 detections · average 168,3 MW · peak 451,4 MWDay
  12. Meteosat11 detections · average 184,4 MW · peak 496,6 MWDay
  13. Meteosat11 detections · average 303,1 MW · peak 780,2 MWDay
  14. Meteosat11 detections · average 274,7 MW · peak 866,3 MWDay
  15. Meteosat10 detections · average 246,7 MW · peak 655 MWDay
  16. Meteosat9 detections · average 160,7 MW · peak 417 MWDay

Nearby

Other fires nearby

Other satellite-observed events within 100 km, nearest first — up to six shown.

All fires in Spain →

  • Extremadura

    21 km away

    No measurable activity in recent satellite observations
    View event facts →
  • Extremadura

    66 km away

    Confirmed by a measured retrieval
    View event facts →
  • Extremadura

    70 km away

    No measurable activity in recent satellite observations
    View event facts →
  • Extremadura

    75 km away

    No measurable activity in recent satellite observations
    View event facts →
  • Extremadura

    100 km away

    No measurable activity in recent satellite observations
    View event facts →